<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>the harvard ichthus &#187; Jim Shirey</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.harvardichthus.org/author/jimshirey/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.harvardichthus.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 22:36:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Good, the Bad, and the Cranky: A Review of Gran Torino</title>
		<link>http://www.harvardichthus.org/sections/books-arts/2009/11/the-good-the-bad-and-the-cranky-a-review-of-gran-torino/</link>
		<comments>http://www.harvardichthus.org/sections/books-arts/2009/11/the-good-the-bad-and-the-cranky-a-review-of-gran-torino/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 22:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Shirey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Books and Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 5, Issue 1]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harvardichthus.org/?p=2211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I tend to be cautious about movies produced and directed by their stars. Turning the camera on oneself begets temptations to egotism that few can completely resist. The worst of such films fetishize their leading men, and even the best, like Braveheart, feel a bit top-heavy. Mel Gibson might have been manly and epic enough [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tend to be cautious about movies produced and directed by their stars. Turning the camera on oneself begets temptations to egotism that few can completely resist. The worst of such films fetishize their leading men, and even the best, like Braveheart, feel a bit top-heavy. Mel Gibson might have been manly and epic enough as William Wallace to make my father cry, but he still stuck out like a sore, handsome thumb.</p>
<p>As it ultimately does with so many Hollywood norms, <em>Gran Torino</em> toys with our expectations of self-aggrandizement: the sore, handsome thumb is still there, but it’s weathered and wrinkled almost, but not quite, past recognition. That thumb (all right, time to stop calling it a thumb) is Clint Eastwood, who produced and directed the film and stars in it as Walt Kowalski, an embittered widower and Korean War veteran whose Detroit neighborhood has changed beyond his ability to keep up.</p>
<p>This, of course, is a formula we all know and love: members of two vastly different cultures, initially separated by fear of and prejudice against one another, break down the barriers that divide them in a series of lighthearted moments. They realize they aren’t so different after all just in time to confront some evil that has been menacing them both. Said evil is defeated, and everyone else lives happily and harmoniously ever after.</p>
<p>Not everyone is living happily ever after at the end of <em>Gran Torino</em>, but the arc is unmistakable. Walt’s increasing interest and involvement in the lives of the Van Lor family — brother Thao (Bee Vang) and sister Sue (Ahney Her), their mother and grandmother and assorted relatives — takes all the expected routes: bitterness and antagonism give way to grudging acceptance and eventual emotional investment as food is exchanged, work is shared, and Walt continually bails the Vang Lors out of trouble, usually by being crankier and more intimidating than their antagonists.</p>
<p>The film’s interactions with Christianity at first seem as trite and superficial as everything else it has going on. Walt battles young the Father Janovich (Christopher Carley) intermittently, refusing to go to Confession despite his late wife’s pleas and insulting the priest repeatedly to his face. Eventually, thanks to Janovich’s persistence, the two wind up sharing a beer and a conversation, and Walt finally agrees to confess. The grumpy old man gets less grumpy and finds God all at once.</p>
<p>It’s certainly nothing new, but the sheer force of Eastwood’s presence carries us through even the baldest of clichés. We may chuckle at the dialogue every now and then, but we still believe it; we still believe the man on the screen, which is all we have to do, because all this, as it turns out, is only rising action, buildup to a climax that wrenches the movie into an entirely new direction and the audience into an entirely different frame of mind.</p>
<p>As Walt gets to know the Vang Lors he also gets to know their enemies, a gang of thugs led by Spider (Doua Moua), whose behavior toward his “cousins” borders on the sociopathic. Despite Walt’s best and increasing efforts to protect his neighbors, Spider’s gang tortures them continually, beating up Thao and eventually (and somewhat inexplicably) shooting up the family’s home and raping Sue. The crimes, and the close-up shots of a bloodied Sue that announce them, cry for action: Someone clearly needs to do something.</p>
<p>What Walt ultimately decides to do is the film’s real statement about Christianity, an affirmation of Christ and a challenge to Christians. Walt doesn’t save the neighborhood by killing the bad guys. He saves it by letting the bad guys kill him. He doesn’t save his friends by fighting for them; he saves them by dying for them. Standing face to face with pure evil, Walt reaches into his coat for a gun he does not have and falls in a hail of bullets. The shots bring the police, who arrest the murderers: the only possible true victory, won by losing.</p>
<p>The worst part is, we feel set up, bait-and-switched. We’re angry; we need our righteous vengeance; we want and expect old Clint Eastwood to open up a can of you-know-what on those you-know-whos. It’s a reasonable expectation: after all, that same Clint Eastwood made a career out of opening said cans on said individuals. It’s a part of our tradition.</p>
<p>But tradition can blind us to reality. The apostles, even as they walked side by side with Christ, expected a conqueror, a Messiah who would vanquish their enemies. What they got was the very picture of humility, a bewildering paradox who rode into Jerusalem like a king only to be led out like a criminal. The gun everyone thought was in his pocket turned out to be a Zippo.</p>
<p>We know the story so well we have a hard time recognizing it. What <em>Gran Torino</em> does in one sense is put us in the shoes of Christ’s friends, setting up an inevitable confrontation between the ultimate good and the ultimate evil and giving victory to good by letting evil win.</p>
<p>But even at its best moment, the moment it’s been building to for two hours, the moment it finally flips the clichés it’s been built on thus far on their ears, Gran Torino can’t seem to help itself. Walt falls to the ground with his arms spread, cruciform. It’s a powerful image, but the Christ-like death scene is, like Eastwood himself, at a point in its life where it only barely escapes self-parody. A moving gesture, yes, but Tony Montana died that way too.</p>
<p>But no matter how <em>Gran Torino</em> goes about making its point, it’s a point worth making. It’s a reminder of the beautiful contradiction at the heart of Christianity, of God’s strength perfected in apparent human weakness. It’s a call to sacrifice, an example of self-denial running parallel to that offered by Jesus on the cross. It’s an affirmation of the Christ who told us “Greater love hath no man than this, than to lay down his life for his friends,” and then showed us exactly what he meant.</p>
<p>At least, I hope so.</p>
<p>Because at this point, I was thrown for yet another loop. The warning bells that usually accompany movies like <em>Gran Torino</em> in my mind, so easily silenced by the rest of the film, were set ringing again by the sound of Eastwood’s aged, brittle voice singing the movie’s theme over its final sequence, an ego trip if ever I’ve heard one.</p>
<p>Maybe it’s some kind of meta-cliché; maybe Eastwood is just toying with us one last time, reminding us, his tongue firmly in his cheek, that it’s his movie and no one else’s. The problem is, there’s no way to tell. <em>Gran Torino</em> might be an exercise in the manipulation of standard Hollywood motifs, in the manipulation of manipulation. But it might, just as likely, be the product of the ego of one old man.</p>
<p>I have nothing against Clint Eastwood, so I’ll give him the benefit of the doubt. But I can’t shake the feeling that maybe, just maybe, <em>Gran Torino</em> arrives at its best moments by accident.<br />
________________________________________________________________________</p>
<p><em>Jim Shirey ‘11 is a Government concentrator living in Kirkland House.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.harvardichthus.org/sections/books-arts/2009/11/the-good-the-bad-and-the-cranky-a-review-of-gran-torino/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Indie Bible</title>
		<link>http://www.harvardichthus.org/issue-archives/4-1/2008/04/the-indie-bible/</link>
		<comments>http://www.harvardichthus.org/issue-archives/4-1/2008/04/the-indie-bible/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 04:05:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Shirey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Books and Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 4, Issue 1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[albums]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fundamentalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hope]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indie rock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hcs.harvard.edu/~ichthus/wordpress/?p=298</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Neon Bible by Arcade Fire. Merge, 2007. I must confess that I had absolutely no intention of liking Neon Bible. Indie rock, that non-genre with which the Montreal-based Arcade Fire is usually affiliated, often strikes me as self-important and musically uninteresting, and as such I was beyond skeptical of their critically acclaimed sophomore release. To [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2><span style="color: #800000;"><em><strong>Neon Bible</strong></em><strong> by Arcade Fire. Merge, 2007.</strong></span></h2>
<p>I must confess that I had absolutely no intention of liking <em>Neon Bible</em>. Indie rock, that non-genre with which the Montreal-based Arcade Fire is usually affiliated, often strikes me as self-important and musically uninteresting, and as such I was beyond skeptical of their critically acclaimed sophomore release. To make an indie rock album is to indulge oneself musically at the risk of alienating (Interpol), boring (Franz Ferdinand), or simply irritating (Bloc Party) the listener, and to make an indie rock album about religion, I thought, would be to heap pretense upon pretense. That said, I have another confession to make about <em>Neon Bible</em>: I loved it.</p>
<p>It took me, admittedly, quite awhile to get to that point. My first time through the album left me exhausted from what I can only call its aural assault and hopelessly adrift in its sea of allusion and metaphor. Unlike so much indie rock, however, <em>Neon Bible</em> was compelling enough to bring me back for another listen, and another after that. The more I listened, the more I realized how musically and lyrically subtle the album is. And the more I came to appreciate that subtlety, the more I came to appreciate the album itself. I sadly have not the space for its extraordinary musical nuance. But Arcade Fire&#8217;s lyrical subtleties are fascinating in their own right, in no small part because they are, at once fundamental and profound, unmistakably Christian.</p>
<p>As its title might suggest, <em>Neon Bible</em> teems with allusions, both occult and overt, to Christianity, quite a few of which are vehicles for criticism. The surprisingly gentle title track, which unfortunately stoops to cliché in adding a heartstring-tugging children&#8217;s choir beneath its chorus, references a risible golden calf, perhaps the perversion of religion practiced by those to whom singer Win Butler addresses the lines &#8220;You lost it but you don&#8217;t know how&#8221; and &#8220;It was wrong but you said it was right.&#8221; Who exactly these hypocrites are Butler does not say, but he is wary of their influence: &#8220;What I know,&#8221; he sings, &#8220;is what you know is right.&#8221; The song&#8217;s final lines are a glum appraisal of fire-and-brimstone Christianity: &#8220;Not much chance for survival / if the Neon Bible is true.&#8221;</p>
<p>The succeeding track, &#8220;Intervention,&#8221; offers an even more severe critique of Christianity, driven with ironic intent by churchly organ chords. Its second line, &#8220;The useless seed is sown,&#8221; is a bitter jab at Jesus&#8217; parable of the Sower and the Seed (Mt. 13). Enraged like Jesus at those who would condemn others, the singer asks &#8220;Who&#8217;s gonna throw the very first stone?&#8221; Lines like &#8220;Working for the Church while your family dies&#8221; and &#8220;Every spark of friendship and love will die without a home&#8221; throw understatement to the wind in a direct attack on blind fanaticism. More unsettling by far is &#8220;Singing Halleluiah with the fear in your heart,&#8221; a line that exposes the hypocritical paradox of a theology requiring both love and terror.</p>
<p>But in the midst of all the song&#8217;s bile, Butler pleads with God to &#8220;Lift me up and take me out of here.&#8221; God is still present, even among the hypocrites who worship Him in vain. Like Job, the singer never doubts God&#8217;s existence, though he questions much about Him. He may distrust His forgiveness in the lines &#8220;The curse is never broken&#8221; from the opening track &#8220;Black Mirror&#8221; and &#8220;Some debts you&#8217;ll never pay&#8221; from &#8220;Intervention;&#8221; he may be tired of His so-called servants, prompting the line &#8220;I don&#8217;t want to live in my father&#8217;s house no more&#8221; in &#8220;Windowsill.&#8221; But he never forsakes God, or believes that God has forsaken him.</p>
<p>This basic faith imbues all of Neon Bible with a quiet hope, a hope found even in &#8220;Ocean of Noise,&#8221; which might be the lament of a soul in Hell. The song&#8217;s vision of damnation owes much to C.S. Lewis &#8211; its title is reminiscent of Screwtape&#8217;s cacophonous pit while another of its phrases, &#8220;this city of empty streets,&#8221; recalls the Hell of <em>The Great Divorce</em>, an ever-expanding city whose inhabitants move farther and farther apart &#8211; and the allusions seem appropriate. Lewis offered a hopeful vision of Christianity indeed, one that would allow a soul to admit, &#8220;All of the reasons I gave were just lies / to buy myself some time,&#8221; and still believe that &#8220;I&#8217;m gonna work it out.&#8221; Whether this belief is tragic or not is for others to debate, and Butler&#8217;s tone makes no comment, but the line keeps the album&#8217;s subtle hope alive.</p>
<p>That hope is first iterated in the album&#8217;s second track, &#8220;Keep The Car Running,&#8221; a mandolin-driven piece that is both an anticipatory vision of Heaven and a call to vigilance, the metaphor of its title reinforced by the line &#8220;they don&#8217;t know where and they don&#8217;t know when,&#8221; an allusion perhaps to Christ&#8217;s statement that &#8220;not even the angels in Heaven&#8221; know the hour of the Last Judgment (Mt. 24:36). It reaches its joyful climax in three songs in the album&#8217;s second half, the first of which, &#8220;The Well and the Lighthouse,&#8221; begins with no hope in sight. Based on a French fable about a wolf who, tempted by a fox, jumps down into a well thinking that the moon reflected in it is a wheel of cheese, the song is stark both musically and lyrically, building to the bleak statement &#8220;You always fall / for what you desire / or what you fear.&#8221; Its message is simple, and at its core Christian: our short-term actions have long-term consequences, and decisions made out of selfishness or led to by lies can be fatal.</p>
<p>But then, abruptly, &#8220;The Well and the Lighthouse&#8221; undergoes a dramatic shift. Suddenly it is a waltz, the only waltz on the album. All at once it is Neon Bible&#8217;s most upbeat piece by far. And, just as quickly, its lyrics become a joyful affirmation of the risen Christ:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Resurrected,<br />
Living in a lighthouse.<br />
If you leave, them ships are gonna wreck.<br />
Resurrected,<br />
Living in a lighthouse<br />
The lions and the lambs ain&#8217;t sleeping yet.</p>
<p>Here at last is resolution: the hope that was once barely audible is now shouted from the rooftops. God is alive and at work, and though the lion has not yet lain down with the lamb, Christ, without whom we are lost, has not left his post as our guide on the way. The battle between love and fear, so painfully apparent in &#8220;Intervention,&#8221; has been decided. Love is the victor, and in its triumph triumphs joy.<br />
This joy carries through to the album&#8217;s penultimate track, &#8220;No Cars Go.&#8221; Almost a postmodern spiritual, &#8220;No Cars Go&#8221; is punctuated by shouts and culminates in the call, &#8220;Little babies . . . women and children . . . old folks / Let&#8217;s go!&#8221; Its most powerful line is &#8220;Us kids know,&#8221; perhaps an invocation of the Christ who said, &#8220;Unless you become like little children, you shall not enter the Kingdom  of Heaven&#8221; (Mt 18:2). The joy of love is no longer passive. We are no longer waiting &#8211; we are going where no cars or planes or subs or spaceships go.</p>
<p><em>Neon Bible</em>&#8216;s final track, &#8220;My Body Is A Cage,&#8221; with its muted, vaguely industrial beat, is one of its most complex and one of its best, providing a sobering but hopeful coda to the joy of &#8220;No Cars Go.&#8221; Its first verse, which begins &#8220;I&#8217;m standing on a stage / of fear and self-doubt,&#8221; recalls Macbeth&#8217;s &#8220;poor player / who struts and frets his hour upon the stage / and then is heard no more,&#8221; hardly a hopeful or a joyous image. Another verse, beginning &#8220;I&#8217;m living in an age / that calls darkness light,&#8221; seems an invitation to despair. The song&#8217;s refrain, &#8220;My body is a cage / that keeps me from dancing with the one I love / but my mind holds the key,&#8221; rings of Gnosticism, the heretical philosophy that considers all good to be in the spirit and all evil to be in the flesh. Beset by confusion from without and within, the singer offers one final plea to God: &#8220;Set my spirit free,&#8221; to which he adds at last, &#8220;Set my body free.&#8221; In the face of his wicked world and his own limitations, he refuses to surrender his hope: there is, despite it all, a God before whom he can stand in supplication. With this reassurance Neon Bible, attacker of Christianity and affirmer of Christ, comes to its close, having ultimately and definitively found God.</p>
<hr size="2" /><em>Jim Shirey &#8217;11 is a first-year student in Pennypacker.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.harvardichthus.org/issue-archives/4-1/2008/04/the-indie-bible/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

