<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Function of Divine Election: Part 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.harvardichthus.org/fishtank/2009/11/the-function-of-divine-election/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.harvardichthus.org/fishtank/2009/11/the-function-of-divine-election/</link>
	<description>a journal of christian thought</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 18:02:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Election: Definition via Function &#171; ἐν Χριστῷ Ἰησοῦ (in Christ Jesus)</title>
		<link>http://www.harvardichthus.org/fishtank/2009/11/the-function-of-divine-election/comment-page-1/#comment-205</link>
		<dc:creator>Election: Definition via Function &#171; ἐν Χριστῷ Ἰησοῦ (in Christ Jesus)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 11:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harvardichthus.org/?p=2065#comment-205</guid>
		<description>[...] leave a comment &#187;  The Fish Tank (the blog of the Harvard Ichthus) has an insightful piece on the doctrine of election. While it won&#8217;t satisfy all the theological and philosophical inquiries of this controversy, it provides an interesting angle that is not always observed. See &#8220;The Function of Divine Election: Part 1:. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] leave a comment &raquo;  The Fish Tank (the blog of the Harvard Ichthus) has an insightful piece on the doctrine of election. While it won&#8217;t satisfy all the theological and philosophical inquiries of this controversy, it provides an interesting angle that is not always observed. See &#8220;The Function of Divine Election: Part 1:. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cameron D. Kirk-Giannini</title>
		<link>http://www.harvardichthus.org/fishtank/2009/11/the-function-of-divine-election/comment-page-1/#comment-204</link>
		<dc:creator>Cameron D. Kirk-Giannini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 18:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harvardichthus.org/?p=2065#comment-204</guid>
		<description>Hey Nick,

I love your approach here.  In fact, I think it&#039;s the /only/ appropriate approach.  After all, the Scriptures seem almost totally unconcerned with telling us what election /is/, focusing instead (as you point out) on its practical significance.  We are therefore obliged to begin by understanding the purpose of election and only when we have done so to hazard a guess about what it is or how it works.  Starting the other way is dangerous and even foolish.

In general, I think we often jump to metaphysical/theological conclusions about issues discussed in scripture without understanding that our conclusions are hypothetical or at least inferential.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Nick,</p>
<p>I love your approach here.  In fact, I think it&#8217;s the /only/ appropriate approach.  After all, the Scriptures seem almost totally unconcerned with telling us what election /is/, focusing instead (as you point out) on its practical significance.  We are therefore obliged to begin by understanding the purpose of election and only when we have done so to hazard a guess about what it is or how it works.  Starting the other way is dangerous and even foolish.</p>
<p>In general, I think we often jump to metaphysical/theological conclusions about issues discussed in scripture without understanding that our conclusions are hypothetical or at least inferential.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Nowalk</title>
		<link>http://www.harvardichthus.org/fishtank/2009/11/the-function-of-divine-election/comment-page-1/#comment-200</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Nowalk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 14:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harvardichthus.org/?p=2065#comment-200</guid>
		<description>Actually, that claim (which may or may not be true) is one that I&#039;ve intentionally laid to the side so far and tried to stay neutral on.  

In waiting to define what election IS and focusing on what election DOES in the Bible, I hoped to forge some rare common ground at the start of the discussion.  Because as I mentioned, all Christians believe in election--they just have wildly varying ways of understanding what it means.  Here I am merely aiming to describe the function of what election (whatever it means!) does within the contexts it appears in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, that claim (which may or may not be true) is one that I&#8217;ve intentionally laid to the side so far and tried to stay neutral on.  </p>
<p>In waiting to define what election IS and focusing on what election DOES in the Bible, I hoped to forge some rare common ground at the start of the discussion.  Because as I mentioned, all Christians believe in election&#8211;they just have wildly varying ways of understanding what it means.  Here I am merely aiming to describe the function of what election (whatever it means!) does within the contexts it appears in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Joseph Porter</title>
		<link>http://www.harvardichthus.org/fishtank/2009/11/the-function-of-divine-election/comment-page-1/#comment-199</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Joseph Porter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 14:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harvardichthus.org/?p=2065#comment-199</guid>
		<description>If we believe that God is loving and merciful, and if we believe that God calls &quot;not because of holiness&quot; (i.e., not because of any inherent worth in one person over another), then how is it fair for God not to call everyone?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If we believe that God is loving and merciful, and if we believe that God calls &#8220;not because of holiness&#8221; (i.e., not because of any inherent worth in one person over another), then how is it fair for God not to call everyone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
