<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Certum Est, Quia Possibile: An Apologetic for the Existence of God</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.harvardichthus.org/issue-archives/4-2/2008/12/certum-est-quia-possibile-an-apologetic-for-the-existence-of-god/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.harvardichthus.org/issue-archives/4-2/2008/12/certum-est-quia-possibile-an-apologetic-for-the-existence-of-god/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 19:20:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Do You Believe? – A Top Five List for the Big Man Upstairs &#124; the harvard ichthus</title>
		<link>http://www.harvardichthus.org/issue-archives/4-2/2008/12/certum-est-quia-possibile-an-apologetic-for-the-existence-of-god/comment-page-1/#comment-7781</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Do You Believe? – A Top Five List for the Big Man Upstairs &#124; the harvard ichthus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 18:02:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hcs.harvard.edu/~ichthus/wordpress/?p=344#comment-7781</guid>
		<description>[...] 5. Another very philosophical reason is a variation of Anselm’s cosmological argument, something along the lines of what Joseph Porter wrote a couple years ago. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 5. Another very philosophical reason is a variation of Anselm’s cosmological argument, something along the lines of what Joseph Porter wrote a couple years ago. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.harvardichthus.org/issue-archives/4-2/2008/12/certum-est-quia-possibile-an-apologetic-for-the-existence-of-god/comment-page-1/#comment-114</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 05:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hcs.harvard.edu/~ichthus/wordpress/?p=344#comment-114</guid>
		<description>To ask the question does god exist. And thus to try to &quot;prove&quot; that god exists, even by quoting scripture etc etc, is in Truth &amp; Reality, to affirm the negative proposition that god does not exist until absolutely proven otherwise by the same doubt-filled mind that asks the question in the first place.

http://www.dabase.org/rgcbpobk.htm

http://www.realgod.org

http://www.dabase.org/noface.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To ask the question does god exist. And thus to try to &#8220;prove&#8221; that god exists, even by quoting scripture etc etc, is in Truth &amp; Reality, to affirm the negative proposition that god does not exist until absolutely proven otherwise by the same doubt-filled mind that asks the question in the first place.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dabase.org/rgcbpobk.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.dabase.org/rgcbpobk.htm</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.realgod.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.realgod.org</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.dabase.org/noface.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.dabase.org/noface.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

